Regardless of fault, the data point conclusively to a dysfunctional system.
Fortunately, things are now moving in the right direction.
Government reforms include a ‘Fast Track Process’ that will improve the review of applications by increasing building inspector and engineer capacity in the BSR(4).
The BSR will also operate under a newly established board in the MHCLG as part of plans to establish a single construction regulator. The government’s hope is these reforms will cut down waiting times and help to accelerate housebuilding activity.
The newly released guidance on submitting high-quality applications should also serve as a turning point. Of the 257 application decisions made by the BSR in 1Q2025, 29.5% were declared invalid – those that do not pass the validation process or are inactive and have not received a decision.
However, addressing delays is one thing. The ability for process reforms to fulfil the government’s 1.5 million new homes target is a different ball game entirely.
Local authorities in urban areas, where development space is limited, will likely require high-rise residential developments to meet housebuilding targets. Doncaster, Oxford and Warwick were among several cities that saw significant increases to housebuilding targets last year(5).
According to regulation, any building of at least seven storeys or 18 metres in height, and/or contains two or more residential units, is considered a HRB and must therefore be assessed by the BSR and pass building control approval at Gateway 2 before work starts.
In other words, ongoing delays could ensure the government’s target is not met.
There’s also no guarantee BSR reforms will significantly reduce the application backlog at the pace needed. As it stands, the current backlog is not going to be cleared overnight.
Other hurdles include rising costs for developers.
As of April, the cost of submitting building control approval applications increased by 5% to £189 per submission(6) and, as of autumn 2026, residential developers will be charged per square metre of gross internal floor space on HRB work under the Building Safety Levy.
While established to elevate building safety, the risk is these measures could disincentivise developers from prioritising certain projects that benefit the government’s housing target.
Housebuilders carefully control housing supply in a way that protects their commercial interests and it’s unlikely smaller businesses will put their profits on the line just to ensure 1.5 million homes are built.
In the past few months, the effects of delays at Gateways 2 and 3 have been keenly felt with BCIS panellists flagging the impact on resource management.
It’s impossible to say whether the long-term impacts of delays will be fully resolved before more regulatory costs are introduced, but their continued presence remains a significant cost burden.
Incentives aside, the feasibility of reaching the housebuilding target already seems unlikely. EPC registrations data show 186,600 (rounded to the nearest 100) homes were built between 9 July 2024, the first meeting of the current Parliament, and 15 June 2025.
To hit their target, the government must average over 300,000 new homes per year, which is a big ask without a significant regulatory backlog.
At this stage, a yellow brick road to 1.5 million new homes is still just a dream.
To keep up to date with the latest industry news and insights from BCIS, register for our newsletter here.